Teams

Andrew P.

2025 Singles Flex League (04 April - 05 May) · 4.0 Men

1 player · average NTRP 4.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Perlas vs Riku Otis5-7, 3-6
2025-05-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Perlas vs Zachary Kondo3-6, 6-7
2025-05-03Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Perlas vs Jacob Peters1-6, 2-6
2025-05-02vs Michael T.Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Perlas vs Michael Taratko3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brian A.5050021
2Jacob P.4141235
3Jakub Z.4141225
4Janai C.4242443
5Jeff N.0101212
6Andrew P.0404850
7June C.05051061

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Perlas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Perlas
47W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.