SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5A
2026 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 2.5
12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule10 played
i
Flight standings23 teams · Women's 2.5
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1MEADOW STC 40AW2.5A | 10 | 0 | 18 | 210 |
| 2NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW2.5A | 9 | 1 | 17 | 205 |
| 3BLACKHAWK CC 40AW2.5A | 9 | 1 | 17 | 207 |
| 4MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40AW2.5A | 8 | 2 | 18 | 175 |
| 5ALPINE HILLS 40AW2.5A | 7 | 3 | 20 | 209 |
| 6MORAGA VALLEY 40AW2.5A | 7 | 3 | 26 | 232 |
| 7FREMONT HILLS CC 40AW2.5A | 7 | 3 | 27 | 209 |
| 8LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40AW2.5A | 6 | 4 | 24 | 215 |
| 9ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AW2.5A | 6 | 4 | 28 | 251 |
| 10LOS GATOS SR 40AW2.5A | 6 | 4 | 32 | 228 |
| 11RIO DEL ORO 40AW2.5A | 6 | 4 | 32 | 259 |
| 12GREENBROOK RS 40AW2.5A | 5 | 5 | 33 | 239 |
| 13EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 40AW2.5A | 5 | 5 | 39 | 287 |
| 14MORAGA CC 40AW2.5A | 4 | 6 | 32 | 244 |
| 15CLAREMONT R and S 40AW2.5A | 4 | 6 | 36 | 273 |
| 16SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5A | 4 | 6 | 38 | 282 |
| 17JOHNSON RANCH 40AW2.5A | 3 | 7 | 42 | 303 |
| 18ROUND HILL CC 40AW2.5A | 3 | 7 | 46 | 316 |
| 19WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW2.5A | 2 | 8 | 40 | 280 |
| 20CASTLEWOOD CC 40AW2.5A | 1 | 9 | 48 | 328 |
| 21BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW2.5A | 1 | 9 | 49 | 329 |
| 22STANFORD-CRA 40AW2.5A | 1 | 9 | 51 | 319 |
| 23GREEN VALLEY CC 40AW2.5A | 1 | 9 | 51 | 332 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Lauren Disston + Dena McManis | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Dena McManis + Allison Weinstein | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Erica Desjardins + Juliana Bryant | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Susie Chao + Christina Gibbons | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.