Teams

Ltc - Giraldo

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-17Split 11
L#2 SinglesRENEE ALEXIS vs Elena Gonzalez5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Vegas de Pardo / Vladlena Funk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-07vs Winner - David Park/MarciSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cabral / Andrea Cornelissen vs Laurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRENEE ALEXIS vs Ali Quintero4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSahar Moghaddam vs Ivet Hernandez2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Brahim / Sally Guerra vs Daniela Gonzalez / Leocadie Ahmes6-4, 6-3
2022-12-05vs Winner - David Park/MarciLost 13
W#1 DoublesAinara Godoy / Sally Guerra vs Laurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMariel Cordero / Elena Sise vs Sandra Deering / Ali Quintero4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSahar Moghaddam vs Elena Gonzalez0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Hughes / Barbara Barrios vs Daniela Gonzalez / Ivet Hernandez3-6, 4-6
2022-11-19vs Winner - David Park/MarciWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Guerra / Camila Giraldo vs Cindy Conine / Courteney Blais6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Mariel Cordero vs Marci Feder / Sandra Deering6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRENEE ALEXIS / Elena Sise vs Laurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-22vs Winner - David Park/MarciLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Katherine Hughes vs Sherril Colombo / Wendy Kraut6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSahar Moghaddam vs Leocadie Ahmes5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCamila Giraldo / Sally Guerra vs Laurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Elena Gonzalez2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Helmer / Maria Vegas de Pardo vs Ali Quintero / Ivet Hernandez4-6, 2-6
2022-10-08vs Winner - David Park/MarciSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Mariel Cordero vs Sherril Colombo / Wendy Kraut1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Leocadie Ahmes3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Camila Giraldo vs Sandra Deering / Ali Quintero6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barrios / RENEE ALEXIS vs Cindy Conine / Laurie Mathews1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Ainara Godoy
published 4.5
4.45
Natasha Torres
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Michelle Castellanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Sally Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.34
Amanda Brahim
published 4.5
4.29
Mariel Cordero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Camila Giraldo
published 4.5
4.21
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Maria Vegas de Pardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Barbara Cabral
published 4.5
4.03
Elena Sise
published 4.5
4.00
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Katherine Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Cornelissen + Sally Guerra4353% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Castellanos + RENEE ALEXIS4351% gamesnot enough data
Sahar Moghaddam + Natasha Torres4267% gamesnot enough data
Sally Guerra + RENEE ALEXIS3242% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Hughes + Natasha Torres224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hughes + Sahar Moghaddam303 matchesnot enough data
Sally Guerra + Sahar Moghaddam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ainara Godoy
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
4.53
4.5
Natasha Torres
155W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Michelle Castellanos
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
4.41
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Sally Guerra
158W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Amanda Brahim
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Mariel Cordero
97W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Camila Giraldo
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Maria Vegas de Pardo
112W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
4.13
4.5
Barbara Cabral
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Elena Sise
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Sahar Moghaddam
280W–189L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Katherine Hughes
25W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.