Teams

MTC Hilbert

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-22vs WOCC Stringer / MoehlingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKati Shick / Erin Euen vs Darlene Moehling / Sandy Pisano4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Elizabeth Garnett0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-20vs CCV ReifsniderSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Windy Campbell1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesErin Euen / Kati Shick vs Laura Whisnand / Michele Phillips6-3, 6-2
2022-07-15vs Westwood Combs-PokrywkaWon 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Louise O'Connor6-1, 6-1
2022-07-13vs Hermitage BetzWon 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Monica Walsh6-1, 6-2
2022-07-08vs SCC TotaroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Beth Cook / Kati Shick vs Nancy Sullivan / Kristin Kim6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Lillie Wauford6-2, 6-0
2022-07-06vs TDC LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesKati Shick / Melissa Miller vs Susan Long / Heidi Collier6-2, 7-6
2022-07-01vs Westwood WatkinsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKati Shick / Rebekah Jamerson vs Barbara Copley / Sheryl Highfill2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Beth Cook / Pamela Stidham vs Janet Livick / Shirley Watkins6-3, 6-2
2022-06-29vs Burkwood JohnsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKati Shick / Erin Euen vs Cynthia Muncy / Francine Durbin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPamela Stidham vs Kim Johnson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lindsay Hardage
published 4
3.52
Margaret Ryan
published
3.47
Pamela Stidham
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.47
Kati Shick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.18
Carol Beth Cook
published 3.5
3.17
Erin Euen
published 3.5
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
Corinne Hilbert
published 3
2.51
Betty Thompson
published 3
Joi Delaney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kati Shick + Lindsay Hardage404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Euen + Robin Meyer033 matchesnot enough data
Robin Meyer + Carol Beth Cook213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Margaret Ryan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 7 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Kati Shick
54W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Carol Beth Cook
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Erin Euen
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Corinne Hilbert
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Betty Thompson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Joi Delaney
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.