Teams

Kjos/Goth-Game, Set, Match, Margaritas!

2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lorna Goth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-07-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Lorna Goth vs Sharon Mathew / Tomoko Iwata6-2, 6-0
2025-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Lorna Goth vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-3, 6-0
2025-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Heidi Kjos vs Julie Bradford / Kaie Wellman7-6, 6-1
2025-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Heidi Kjos vs Carly Vendegna / Ariana White7-5, 6-1
2025-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Heidi Kjos vs Lindsey Kahler / Marina Rubinshteyn7-5, 6-2
2025-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Lorna Goth vs Colleen Nolan / Erin Casey6-3, 6-2
2025-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Lorna Goth vs Angie Stromquist / Rachel Ritchie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Heidi Kjos vs Crystal Bryant / Michele Snyder7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lorna Goth
124W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.77
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.