Teams

DARA WOODRUFF

2026 SETX 40 & Over · 3.5 Women 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-12vs STEPHANY BRYANTWon 10
W#1 SinglesLori Moore vs Stephany Bryant0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-03vs STEPHANY BRYANTLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Moore / Michelle Foster vs Jill Williams / Theresa Edwards4-6, 4-6
2026-02-26vs PENNY VAYONLost 01
L#1 SinglesLori Moore vs Penny Vayon4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Cheryl Rizzo
published 3.5
2.97
Angie LaBiche
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Charlean Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.93
Remi Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Becky Rutledge
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Lori Moore
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.85
Kasey Foster
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Dara Woodruff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Shirley Boone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Daphne Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathy Berry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlean Lindsey + Angie LaBiche6454% games−5.5% vs expected
Charlean Lindsey + Becky Rutledge123 matchesnot enough data
Charlean Lindsey + Daphne Bell123 matchesnot enough data
Remi Bryan + Lori Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Rizzo
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Angie LaBiche
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Charlean Lindsey
22W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Remi Bryan
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Becky Rutledge
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lori Moore
36W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
Kasey Foster
22W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Dara Woodruff
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Shirley Boone
12W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Daphne Bell
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kathy Berry
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.