Teams

55 Aces-CCV - Strickler

2025 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-21vs Salisbury-RiegelWon 21
W#1 DoublesAl Strickler III / Charles Makepeace vs James Chicklo / John Spichiger6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Campbell / Matthew Wherry vs Michael Miller / Dan Riegel4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Hancock / Tom Cricchi vs John Barnes / Taylor Clarke6-4, 6-3
2025-08-14vs Salisbury-RiegelWon 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Gordon / William Carli vs John Barnes / James Chicklo6-1, 6-0
2025-08-07vs Wyndham HouffLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Carli / Greg Gordon vs Lee Brooks / Geoff Campbell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-31vs MRTC THORNTONWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Carli / Greg Gordon vs Jay Munya / Charlie Wilson6-3, 6-3
2025-07-24vs Old Westwood Whackers - PayneLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Carli / Greg Gordon vs Brewster Brown / Charles Stafford0-6, 2-6
2025-07-17vs ACAC Pfeiffer Big NastyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Wherry / William Carli vs Marc Oosterhuis / William Price6-7, 1-6
2025-07-07vs MRTC THORNTONLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Carli / Richard Witty vs Darren Jones / Jay Munya3-6, 2-6
2025-07-03vs Wyndham HouffLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Carli / Richard Witty vs Geoff Campbell / Lee Brooks2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
William Carli
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.76
Al Strickler III
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Greg Gordon
published
3.65
Matthew Wherry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Tom Cricchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
David Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Charles Makepeace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Philip Gee
published
Richard Witty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Carli + David Campbell134 matchesnot enough data
Al Strickler III + Charles Makepeace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
William Carli
75W–68L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Al Strickler III
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Greg Gordon
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Matthew Wherry
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Tom Cricchi
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
David Campbell
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
4
Charles Makepeace
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Philip Gee
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Witty
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.