Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesMary Gamble / Kathy Halligan vs Angela Merola / Pam Myers0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLiya Truong vs Kelly Thompson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Henke / Kimberly Wong vs Dawn Schlagel / Nancy Wong4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Kunzman / Delia Tamayo vs Elaine Madson / Ulu McBride3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLeslie Grevin / Kathy Halligan vs Nancy Wong / Jennifer Westly2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJaime Klinke vs Ulu McBride3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSally Kingshill-Alarie / Karen Rocco vs Lisa Dierking / Angela Merola5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLorie Moore / Lauren West vs Shay Martin / Sara C Mazza4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Korte
published 4
3.58
Sally Kingshill-Alarie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Lauren West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Mary Gamble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Delia Tamayo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Leslie Grevin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Carol Debello
published 4
3.34
Erin Henke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jaime Klinke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Karen Rocco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Liya Truong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lorie Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Kunzman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Gamble + Kathy Halligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Korte
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Kingshill-Alarie
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Lauren West
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Delia Tamayo
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Leslie Grevin
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Carol Debello
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jaime Klinke
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Karen Rocco
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Liya Truong
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lorie Moore
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Monica Kunzman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.