Teams

Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XD

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-10vs TYCC - S. BillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesGerardo Cuevas / Maki Smith vs Gregg Coldiron / Anne-Lucie Bouchard6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristina Dorothy / Edwin Jagger vs Samuel Biller / Beth Thompson7-6, 6-3
2024-02-25vs TYCC - S. BillerWon 30
W#1 DoublesIgnacio Molina / Christina Dorothy vs Samuel Biller / Karen MacCormack6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Stephanie Wager vs Anne-Lucie Bouchard / Kevin Platt6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLilivette Arroyo / Scott Schuhriemen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-11vs TYCC - S. BillerWon 20
W#2 DoublesLilivette Arroyo / Ignacio Molina vs Anne-Lucie Bouchard / Kevin Platt6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Stephanie Wager vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-21vs TYCC - S. BillerWon 10
W#2 DoublesGerardo Cuevas / Stephanie Means vs Samuel Biller / Beth Thompson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Gail Gibson
published
4.41
Edwin Jagger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
Manuel Alvarez
published
4.39
Stephanie Wager
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Stephanie Means
published
4.33
Lilivette Arroyo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Christina Dorothy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Ignacio Molina
published
4.08
Gerardo Cuevas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Maki Smith
published
3.94
Amy Lyons
published 4.5
Scott Schuhriemen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.44
Edwin Jagger
57W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Manuel Alvarez
22W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Stephanie Wager
55W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
Stephanie Means
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Lilivette Arroyo
50W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
4.33
4.5
Christina Dorothy
134W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Ignacio Molina
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Gerardo Cuevas
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Maki Smith
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Scott Schuhriemen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.