Teams

Massarelli

2024 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Women · Loudoun Weekday Doubles 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-26vs Fire Balls 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Jill Poretz vs Alexandra Castleberry / Paige Fishel6-0, 6-4
2024-02-29vs RoelligSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mitchell / Jill Poretz vs Kristin Clark / Kim Klimkiewicz4-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Mary Ann Larson vs Alison Duenkel / Suzanne Stroup6-1, 6-6
2024-02-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mitchell / Jill Poretz vs Renee Wall / Allison Kearney6-4, 6-1
2024-02-02vs HopkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Wendy Massarelli vs Nancy Gordon / Janet Thede6-4, 3-4
2024-01-08vs Doubles or NothingLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Carruthers / Jill Poretz vs Ashley la Shelle / Jennifer Fox2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Weekday Doubles 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Susan Speciale
published
3.68
Wendy Massarelli
published 4
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
published
3.62
Melissa Carruthers
published
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.38
Maureen Bornholdt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Tina Le
published
3.28
Anne Flam
published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Moffett
published
3.08
Jen Kaine
published
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.87
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Bornholdt + Jill Poretz4353% gamesnot enough data
Jill Poretz + Mary Ann Larson033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Moffett + Jeannie Matteson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Speciale
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Wendy Massarelli
4W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Melissa Carruthers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tina Le
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Anne Flam
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Lisa Moffett
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Jen Kaine
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.