Teams

SGV Heavy Hitters-St Clair-Arcadia/SU11

2025 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesNick Leonard vs Ramiro Rivas6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDan Peirson vs Andy Miller6-4, 6-2
2025-03-15vs SGV Foxes-Rodriguez-WN/SA2Split 11
W#1 SinglesMark Shiroishi vs Khang Nguyen6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesNeal St. Clair vs Juan Guevara3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStanley Tong vs Richard Ortiz-Reyes0-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMark Shiroishi vs Miguel Ortiz-Reyes1-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs SGV Dare Doubles-Yeh-WN/SAWon 30
W#1 SinglesNick Leonard vs Delong Cen6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDan Peirson vs Huan Xu6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesElias Johansson-Miller vs Hao Truong6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNick Leonard vs Juan Francisco JR Betancourt6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDan Peirson vs Joshua Esparza6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMark Shiroishi vs Daniel Reyes Loaiza6-2, 6-3
2025-02-09vs SGV Vipers-Rauen-Lakewood TC/SU10Won 21
W#1 SinglesNick Leonard vs Geoffrey Rauen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDan Peirson vs David Zobler6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNeal St. Clair vs Shayan Dhanani2-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs SGV LLW Bubble team-Yu-WN/SALost 12
L#1 SinglesStanley Tong vs Ruoyuan Wang2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDan Peirson vs Shaoxiong Yuan6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesBrian Duenas vs Michael Wang0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Duenas
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Dan Peirson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Nick Leonard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Neal St. Clair
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.25
Elias Johansson-Miller
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Mark Shiroishi
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Stanley Tong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Duenas
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Dan Peirson
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Leonard
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Neal St. Clair
34W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Elias Johansson-Miller
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mark Shiroishi
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stanley Tong
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.