Teams

BC-MCC/VeronicaDeutsch

2025 TRI LEVEL MX Jan · March 4.0 3.5 3.0 BC LOCAL LEAGUE

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for March 4.0 3.5 3.0 BC LOCAL LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tammy Hoffman
published
3.84
Thomas Browne
published
3.81
Pamela Lopez
published
3.75
Renee Tinker
published
3.66
Tarik Hossain
published
3.62
Keith Simpson
published
3.51
Rick Rumpp
published
3.50
Kristina Mohr
published
3.50
Jenny Jackson
published
3.47
Monika Hoffman
published
3.46
Brittanie Budinger
published 3.5
Gina Chodler
published 3.5
3.24
David Nachman
published 3.5
3.15
Marcos Cline
published
3.11
Dave Binney
published 3.5
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
2.98
Russell Hossain
published
2.95
Veronica Deutsch
published
2.92
Zoe Frank
published
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
Linda Cronkite
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Deutsch + Keith Simpson2345% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Hoffman
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
Thomas Browne
37W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Tarik Hossain
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Keith Simpson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
Rick Rumpp
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Jenny Jackson
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Monika Hoffman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Brittanie Budinger
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Gina Chodler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Nachman
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Marcos Cline
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dave Binney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Russell Hossain
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Veronica Deutsch
44W–94L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Zoe Frank
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Linda Cronkite
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.