Teams

Team Christie

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs Team JulieLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Penny Rohacek / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Morris vs Victoria Yu0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Eleanor Morse vs Kai Sims / Blair Robinson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-18vs Team MarleneLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Eleanor Morse vs Susan Brunner / Kathy McArthur1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Morris vs Michelle Dietz2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Marlene Dodge / Aliki Joannides4-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Team JulieLost 03
L#1 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Song Bliss / Julie Raymond-Yakoubian0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristie Wyzykowski vs Penny Rohacek0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Morris / Eleanor Morse vs Kai Sims / Victoria Yu1-6, 1-6
2025-05-17vs Team MarleneWon 21
W#1 DoublesCecilia Hopper / Christie Wyzykowski vs Michelle Dietz / Kathy McArthur7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEleanor Morse vs Aliki Joannides6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Morris / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Susan Brunner / Marlene Dodge0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Cecilia Hopper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Eleanor Morse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.51
Christie Wyzykowski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.09
Julie Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Lesleigh Kowalski Frank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Wyzykowski + Cecilia Hopper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Hopper
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Eleanor Morse
36W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Christie Wyzykowski
59W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Julie Morris
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Lesleigh Kowalski Frank
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.