Teams

ACP.Evans

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-16vs MCP.BarcinasLost 01
L#2 DoublesSydney Rushing / Wilda Eade vs Karen Reynders / Paige Jennings1-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs LOCH.TerjesenWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Ramirez / Wilda Eade vs MacKenzie Williams / Keely Williams6-4, 7-6
2024-07-24vs TING.RayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Najia Cheema vs Angela Ray / Emily Starritt3-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs TOC.ShuklaLost 02
L#2 DoublesWilda Eade / Desiree Evans vs Elizabeth Short / Stephanie Charlino1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Amy Condon vs Kari Barsness / Smita Shukla1-6, 1-6
2024-06-25vs ACP.TandradinataLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Wilda Eade vs Lori Jensen / Aulia Tandradinata1-6, 3-6
2024-06-18vs LOCH.TerjesenLost 02
L#2 DoublesWilda Eade / Susan Ramirez vs Gillian Kelleher / Yvette LeGrande6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Jamie Hinckley vs Holly Santago / Devon Wadsworth3-6, 5-7
2024-06-11vs MCP.BarcinasLost 02
L#2 DoublesSydney Rushing / Wilda Eade vs Connie Kim / Tanya Barcinas3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Susan Ramirez vs Robyn Merck / Bracha Blanc3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-28vs TOC.ShuklaWon 10
W#3 DoublesDesiree Evans / Jamie Hinckley vs Smita Shukla / Kari Barsness6-2, 6-1
2024-05-21vs ACP.TandradinataLost 01
L#3 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Amy Condon vs Lauren Fye / Debbie Castiller1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lindsay Castret
published
3.46
Najia Cheema
published
3.03
Jamie Hinckley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Wilda Eade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Susan Ramirez
published
2.86
Michele Mulcahy
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Hinckley + Michele Mulcahy111348% games+6.2% vs expected
Wilda Eade + Michele Mulcahy134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Castret
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
Najia Cheema
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Jamie Hinckley
109W–139L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Wilda Eade
38W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.00
Susan Ramirez
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Michele Mulcahy
150W–166L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.