Teams

OC Irvine - Great Park - Nikki - 11

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-28vs OC NBTC - Elaiza - 10Won 40
W#1 DoublesGina Christiansen / Shiva Shokouhi vs Allegra Fulcher / Larah Telesco6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCHRISTY PARENTE vs Carey Welbourn6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNikki Bartlette / Leslie Boehm vs Gigi Farris / Gianna Marchal6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTara Bradley / Suzanne Weinstock vs Elaiza Capan / Maria Kelley6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Suzanne Weinstock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Gina Christiansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
CHRISTY PARENTE
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Maria Valera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Nikki Bartlette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Leslie Boehm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Shapiro
published 3.5
3.09
Lissett MacHado
published
2.83
Joanne Cordero
published
LESLIE SWAN
published
Melanie Hoopes
published
Tara Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Bartlette + Leslie Boehm3252% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Weinstock + Pam Schuler314 matchesnot enough data
Shiva Shokouhi + Nikki Bartlette213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Weinstock
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Gina Christiansen
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
CHRISTY PARENTE
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Maria Valera
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Nikki Bartlette
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Leslie Boehm
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 10 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lissett MacHado
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Joanne Cordero
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
LESLIE SWAN
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Hoopes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Bradley
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.