Teams

RCW Racquettes 2.5 - DeCapria

2026 USTA 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-14vs Lancaster CC - Shand/StadelWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Yuskevich / Ashley Cope vs Lauren Stadel / Malena Kramer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWenye Deng / Marsha Doom vs Persila Mertz / Erin Bavington5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKay Igyor / Giusy Milazzo Leanza vs Sandy Lutz / Allison Barrett1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJacqui Hershberger vs Alina Fortunas1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Doom / Katie Decapria vs Linda Rasmuson / Julie Patten0-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs RCW Love Breakers - HanleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTessa Lydic / Emma George vs Meghan Rolon / Rachel Frey6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesWenye Deng vs Kimberly Hainley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarsha Doom / Tracey Smith vs Morgan Husted / Laura Merchant7-6, 6-3
2026-06-17vs Hershey Skor - RenaudLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmma George / Giusy Milazzo Leanza vs Erica Jolly / Laura Renaud5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWenye Deng vs Raheeq Darweesh1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTessa Lydic / Kay Igyor vs Audra Graves / Jill Hasson0-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs RCW Love Breakers - HanleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Cope / Katie Decapria vs Kimberly Hainley / Laura Begin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Neihart / Emma George vs Agnes Johnson / Rachel Frey6-1, 6-1
2026-05-26vs Yacta - AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Yuskevich / Ashley Cope vs Julie Swimley / Louisa Fitzgerald6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Decapria vs Barbetta Moffatt0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Cepeda / Kay Igyor vs Mary Reigart / Heather Then6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-18vs (CPD) CCY - BallanLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Cope / Giusy Milazzo Leanza vs Melissa Tony / Rana Ballan6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEmma George vs Jolene Tolbert4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Decapria / Tiffany Neihart vs Frans Beltran / Sarah Yoder1-6, 2-6
2026-05-11vs Bent Creek Rally Girls - ArtersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Neihart / Ashley Yuskevich vs Kayla Garber / Elina Klinge6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGiusy Milazzo Leanza vs Megan Murphy2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTessa Lydic / Mary Cepeda vs Hayley Foley / Leah Fox7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1(CPD) CCY - Ballan0817717188
2Hempfield Everlasting Lobstoppers - Culp0816818162
3Lancaster CC - Shand/Stadel08131122195
4RCW Racquettes 2.5 - DeCapria08121225198
5Yacta - Anderson08131126223
6Bent Creek Rally Girls - Arters0891534238
7RCW Love Breakers - Hanley0812346279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Wenye Deng
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
2.58
Ashley Cope
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.50
Ashley Yuskevich
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Tiffany Neihart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Mary Cepeda
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Ashleigh Gallagher
published 2.5
2.24
Giusy Milazzo Leanza
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.19
Emma George
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.16
Tessa Lydic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Katie Decapria
usually #3 Doubles 22%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.00
Jacqui Hershberger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.94
Kay Igyor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.87
Marsha Doom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Cope + Ashley Yuskevich4159% games+15.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wenye Deng
12W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.59
2.5
Ashley Cope
8W–4L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
2.5
Ashley Yuskevich
12W–8L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Tiffany Neihart
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Mary Cepeda
30W–51L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Ashleigh Gallagher
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Giusy Milazzo Leanza
21W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Emma George
5W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Tessa Lydic
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Katie Decapria
2W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jacqui Hershberger
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kay Igyor
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Marsha Doom
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.