Teams

MLF PURPLE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Wendy Sprague vs Laurie Hittesdorf / Michelle Kennedy6-2, 6-2
2021-07-12vs TAGSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Dawn Setser3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Hay-Arthur / Jacalyn Petersen vs Shelly Donahue / Gail Sullivan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-05vs HMTC CRIMSONSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Debbie Hansen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Hay-Arthur / Jacalyn Petersen vs Michelle Fang / Vivian Watson6-4, 7-5
2021-06-28vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Kristie Steinbock / Diane Erickson6-3, 6-0
2021-06-21vs TAGWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracy Hutton / Jacalyn Petersen vs Shelly Donahue / Shirley Moore6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Beth Smits6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-14vs HMTC CRIMSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Tracy Hutton vs Jennifer Grim / Lori Masi6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShannon Bigner / Kathy Carlson vs Kathy Peden / Susan Seiler3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Tracy Hutton
published 3.5
3.09
Jacalyn Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Kathy Carlson
published
Shannon Bigner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Tiffany Burns
published
2.41
Wendy Sprague
published
Katherine Prudhomme
published
Libby Nikkel
published
Sarah Hay-Arthur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacalyn Petersen + Wendy Sprague224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Carlson + Carolyn Schultz-Walter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Hutton
71W–37L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3
Jacalyn Petersen
71W–32L career · type S · 6 lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
3.09
Kathy Carlson
31W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carolyn Schultz-Walter
23W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Shannon Bigner
41W–62L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tiffany Burns
14W–22L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.48
Wendy Sprague
25W–53L career · no lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
2.41
Katherine Prudhomme
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Libby Nikkel
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Hay-Arthur
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.