Teams

SD 4.5 Balboa TC/ Jordan

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-17vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ WalkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolynne Yen / Ruth Young vs Kristine Cassar / Shelley Goodson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-14vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays CassasusWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiki Shintani / MARCIA FIMBRES vs Gabriela Casasus / Cristina Rassvetaieff6-3, 6-2
2022-10-31vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays CassasusWon 10
W#2 DoublesMasako Beppu / Carolynne Yen vs Gabriela Casasus / Tugce Varol6-0, 6-4
2022-10-17vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ WalkerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie vs Shelley Goodson / Kristine Cassar2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Young / Carolynne Yen vs Kellie Jaquez / Caron Schraeder6-1, 7-5
2022-10-03vs SD 4.5 La Jolla TC/ RepettiLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Young / Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie vs Fiona Taylor / Carolyn Barber2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMiki Shintani / Narelle Pettee vs Masako Wilson / Kathy Wong3-6, 2-6
2022-09-26vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ WalkerLost 02
L#2 DoublesBeatriz MuzquizdeGillespie / Elizabeth Jordan vs Kellie Jaquez / Caron Schraeder1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMiki Shintani / MARCIA FIMBRES vs Tiffinie Harpster / Dolores Ilko2-6, 2-6
2022-09-19vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays CassasusLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Sprague / Miki Shintani vs Tugce Varol / Debbie McBride6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-09-12vs SD 4.5 La Jolla TC/ RepettiWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeatriz MuzquizdeGillespie / Elizabeth Jordan vs Carolyn Barber / Kathy Wong7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEva Bonelli / Carolynne Yen vs Sophia Richardson / Stacie Hunt7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Carolynne Yen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Eva Bonelli
published 4.5
4.01
Miki Shintani
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Sue Sprague
published 4
3.71
Carol Gay
published 4
Janice Draper
published
MARCIA FIMBRES
published
Ruth Young
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolynne Yen
115W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Eva Bonelli
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Miki Shintani
58W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Beatriz MuzquizdeGillespie
15W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Sue Sprague
28W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Carol Gay
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Janice Draper
16W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MARCIA FIMBRES
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Young
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.