Teams

CHAMISAL TC 55AW8.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Barnett / Deirdre Zamler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAsuman Johnson / Deirdre Zamler vs Michelle Rudolph / Kathleen Ventimiglia2-4
2025-04-05vs SEASCAPE SC 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Zamler / Julie A Vucina vs Deana Dyal / Jill Valcarcel2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Kathrin Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Josie Calanni
published
3.86
Deirdre Zamler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Molly McGee
published
Asuman Johnson
published 4
3.74
Laura Forlini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Jo Ann Magpusao
published
3.57
Lisa Barnett
published
3.53
Tammara Chavez
published
3.15
Linda Scholink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie A Vucina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Moran
published
Pauline Meyer
published
Priscilla Henry
published
Rosemary Favazza
published
Sarah Sutton-Deakin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deirdre Zamler + Laura Forlini4172% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Barnett + Deirdre Zamler303 matchesnot enough data
Josie Calanni + Tammara Chavez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathrin Brown
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Josie Calanni
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Deirdre Zamler
88W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Molly McGee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Asuman Johnson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Forlini
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jo Ann Magpusao
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Lisa Barnett
49W–40L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tammara Chavez
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Linda Scholink
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.15
Julie A Vucina
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Moran
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pauline Meyer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Henry
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Favazza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Sutton-Deakin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.