Teams

TAG

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-16vs LVTAWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Fugate / Cheri Gipson vs Valerie Hecker / Brian Smith7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-09vs FCCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheri Gipson / Robert Herrera vs Kaylyn Shelby / Josh Shelby5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-02vs HMTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesGail Draper / Bobby Diaz vs Stu Hoime / Kelley Hoime6-2, 6-2
2021-04-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGail Draper / Arnie Mascarenas vs Aaron Phillips / Jennifer Fields3-6, 4-6
2021-04-18vs MLF BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Arnie Mascarenas vs Jesse Chavez / LaRae Sehr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Fugate / Cheri Gipson vs Seokjin Lee / Trudy Samuelson2-6, 3-6
2021-04-11vs LVTAWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobby Diaz / Gail Draper vs Brian Smith / Whitney Schroeder3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-04vs FCCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheri Gipson / Jeff Fugate vs Carolyn Knape / Joseph Knape3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Gail Draper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Debra Netzel
published 4
3.80
Paige Gilles
published
Bobby Diaz
published 4
3.71
Robert Herrera
published
3.66
Arnie Mascarenas
published 4
3.56
Cheri Gipson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jeff Fugate
published
Mark Oates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bobby Diaz + Gail Draper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gail Draper
154W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Debra Netzel
69W–54L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Paige Gilles
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bobby Diaz
29W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Herrera
49W–32L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Arnie Mascarenas
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Cheri Gipson
45W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Jeff Fugate
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Oates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.