Teams

GSCC BLUE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-23vs CROWN SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesCameron Williams / Mark Terkun vs Marlin Rhodes / Zach Stuart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristian Terzich / Mattias Pitka vs Robert Sanderson / Bryan Snow4-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs CROWN SILVERLost 01
L#1 SinglesMattias Pitka vs Pearson Roberts4-6, 1-6
2025-09-09vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Scheidt / Michael Check vs Howard Roney / Zach Stuart6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMattias Pitka vs Kipling Gomez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Terzich / Cameron Williams vs David Joseph / Bryan Snow4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-02vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Knight / Mattias Pitka vs Marlin Rhodes / Howard Roney1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChristian Terzich vs Andy Ralston6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMax Lee / Jeff Aldrich vs Robert Sanderson / Pearson Roberts0-6, 0-6
2025-08-26vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Terkun / Michael Check vs Kipling Gomez / Pearson Roberts7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristian Terzich vs David Joseph2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMax Lee / Mattias Pitka vs Shawn Lawrence / Robert Sanderson3-6, 3-6
2025-08-19vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Terkun / Cameron Williams vs Marlin Rhodes / David Joseph1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Check vs Kipling Gomez2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMattias Pitka / Christian Terzich vs Bryan Snow / Andy Ralston7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Mark Terkun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Michael Check
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Jeff Aldrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christian Terzich
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Mattias Pitka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ryan Scheidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Terkun + Michael Check303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Terkun
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Michael Check
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jeff Aldrich
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Christian Terzich
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mattias Pitka
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Scheidt
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.