Teams

3-SPostRust-DFC

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Day

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-01vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Sharon Campbell3-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Draughon / Susana Harvey vs Rita O'Sullivan / Patty Dischinger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-25vs 4-PMathena-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Beth Huebner4-6, 2-6
2022-04-11vs 5-CBaddour-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Kim / Susie Post-Rust vs Barbara Estay / Deborah Howard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-04vs 2-MFitzgerald-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusie Post-Rust / Sharon Huang vs Michelle Fitzgerald / Janette Cunningham6-0, 6-0
2022-03-28vs 4-PMathena-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Karin Yoch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Draughon / Mary Parker vs Hallie Shinn / Nancy Riefkohl3-5
2022-03-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesSue Dunn / Nancy Draughon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-07vs 1-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesNancy Draughon vs Sharon Campbell3-6, 4-6
2022-02-28vs 2-MFitzgerald-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusie Post-Rust / Connie Kim vs Christine Peeples / Suzanne Fitzpatrick6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Draughon / Barbara Gillespie vs Kim Ledlow / Jennifer O'Sullivan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.48
Nancy Draughon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Alden
published
2.97
Jeanne Murray
published
Darlene Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Draughon + Susana Harvey551264% games+2.5% vs expected
Susie Post-Rust + Susana Harvey1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 7 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Susan Alden
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Jeanne Murray
13W–31L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Darlene Williams
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.