Teams

BRMST RED

2026 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-09vs CVTA PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Booton / Sandra Waters vs Jennifer Ufland / Windy Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Lauren Benson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Tedesco / Melissa Clarke vs Susi Gardner / Julie Lochner6-3, 6-1
2026-05-02vs MEA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Waters / Laura Tedesco vs Heather Middleton / Jahnavi Brenner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Shannon Hassan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Booton / Melissa Clarke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesHillary Riley / Morgan Arvisais vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Booton / Keelan Blazer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-11vs CVTA PINKWon 21
L#1 DoublesClaudia Booton / Morgan Arvisais vs Jennifer Ufland / Julie Lochner2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHillary Riley vs Catriona Murray6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Tedesco / Keelan Blazer vs Leigha Cochran / Windy Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-04vs RCC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Booton / Morgan Arvisais vs Michele Gosselin / Jeanne Peoples1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Meghan Vogel4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKeelan Blazer / Melissa Clarke vs Yayoi Shaw / Sarah Campbell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-28vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Tedesco / Melissa Clarke vs Hilary Talocco / Jahnavi Brenner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSandra Waters vs Kyrianna Krzystek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Chan / Claudia Booton vs Mary Jensen / Shannon Hassan5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Sandra Waters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.78
Melissa Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Courtney Chan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Hillary Riley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Morgan Arvisais
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Laura Tedesco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Claudia Booton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.25
Keelan Blazer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Clarke + Laura Tedesco7455% games+4.4% vs expected
Hillary Riley + Morgan Arvisais13653% games−2.6% vs expected
Laura Tedesco + Claudia Booton2539% games−9.7% vs expected
Melissa Clarke + Claudia Booton123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Tedesco + Hillary Riley303 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Booton + Morgan Arvisais033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Waters
13W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Melissa Clarke
72W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Courtney Chan
33W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hillary Riley
70W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Morgan Arvisais
58W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Laura Tedesco
67W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Claudia Booton
72W–138L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
Keelan Blazer
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.