Teams

EW-WRAC-Rechtin

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-12vs EW-PC-KohanWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Jaquish / Mark Taylor vs Derek Peacock / Bart Munson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Lester / Stephen Knox vs Wayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGreg Brizendine / Steve Ovenell vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson6-4, 7-5
2026-04-11vs YTC-FergusonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Tom Rechtin vs Mark Cherry / Ken Wagar0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Lester / Stephen Knox vs Rick Vaughan / Terry Keenhan6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGreg Brizendine / Steve Ovenell vs David Whiteside / Dan Ferguson6-3, 6-3
2026-04-10vs PFC-WillmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Lester / Stephen Knox vs Ray Willman / John Omlin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Tom Rechtin vs Robert Vancott / Clark Richards6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Brizendine / David Jaquish vs Steve Lamberson / Charles McElligott6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Greg Brizendine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Jaquish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mark Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Lester
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Knox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Ovenell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Rechtin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Lester + Tom Rechtin6457% games+8.0% vs expected
Richard Lester + Stephen Knox4166% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Knox + Michael Bendtsen3266% gamesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Michael Bendtsen224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Lester + Mark Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Stephen Knox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Greg Brizendine
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
David Jaquish
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Taylor
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Lester
38W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Knox
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Ovenell
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Rechtin
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.