Teams

Morley, Luba

2021 55&Over Men · 9.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-25vs Jericho Westbury, Mintz/RosnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKenneth Luba / Mitchell Kessler vs Marc Weingard / Robert Dwek5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichael Biggiani / Richard Bates vs Lane Lerner / Joseph Perri1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Luba / Mitchell Kessler vs Adam Kolenberg / Donald Wall2-6, 2-6
2021-08-05vs Jericho Westbury, Mintz/RosnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Brill / Kenneth Luba vs Robert Karen / Barry Levine3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Biggiani / Steven Brill vs Adam Kolenberg / Mark Beares1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMitchell Kessler / Kenneth Luba vs David Brent / Lionel Goldberg7-5, 6-3
2021-07-14vs Jericho Westbury, Mintz/RosnerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteven Brill / Michael Biggiani vs Wyn Mintz / Robert Karen2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Luba / Mitchell Kessler vs J Waterhouse / Raj Nagdev6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Biggiani / Richard Bates vs Lawrence Lehman / Sadik Sendich2-6, 3-6
2021-06-23vs Jericho Westbury, Mintz/RosnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Biggiani / John Sorenson vs Wyn Mintz / Allan Rosner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Biggiani / John Sorenson vs Adam Kolenberg / Mark Beares1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jericho Westbury, Mintz/Rosner0816817179
2LI: Carefree/Nassau Indoor, Kolenberg/Lehman0817718178
3Morley, Luba0832142269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Brady
published 4
Kenneth Luba
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Biggiani
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Mitchell Kessler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Steve Geller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Luba + Mitchell Kessler251952% games+2.6% vs expected
Kenneth Luba + James Brady5652% gamesnot enough data
Mitchell Kessler + James Brady6257% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Luba + Michael Biggiani123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Brady
37W–30L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth Luba
78W–66L career · 15 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Biggiani
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mitchell Kessler
40W–31L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Geller
24W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.