Teams

Royal Payne

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 3.5 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-29vs River Strand WestonWon 20
W#2 DoublesBonita Fyala / Jane Welihozkiy vs Susan Nicoletti / Sherri Archondo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Hackney / Tara MacDonaldsmith vs Karen Baig / Vikki Parker6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs LBK Public MermaidsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBonita Fyala / Jane Welihozkiy vs Kelly French / Faye Blakely6-3, 7-6
2025-05-15vs Meadows SpielLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Hackney / Jane Welihozkiy vs Susan Gillis / Jessica Ruszczyk6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs SSC Ross 40 SpringWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Hackney / Lynn Heinz vs Mauri Blefeld / Lorraine Forzani6-1, 6-0
2025-04-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Hackney / Mary Welch vs Joan McDermott / Brenda Dowling6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Laurel Oak Love MatchLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Loomis / Donna Hackney vs Lynne Powell / Teena Kite6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
April Hosty
published 3.5
3.35
Bonita Fyala
published 3.5
3.31
Lynn Heinz
published
3.28
Donna Hackney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Jamie O'Dazier
published 3.5
Erika Cvencek
published 3
Jane Welihozkiy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jo Anne Cullen
published
Linda Evans
published
Mary Welch
published
Pamela Mousseau
published
Sarah Loomis
published
Sigi Moriece
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Welihozkiy + Donna Hackney4253% gamesnot enough data
April Hosty + Lynn Heinz314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Evans + Jo Anne Cullen123 matchesnot enough data
Bonita Fyala + Pamela Mousseau123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
April Hosty
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Bonita Fyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lynn Heinz
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Donna Hackney
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jamie O'Dazier
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Erika Cvencek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Welihozkiy
49W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jo Anne Cullen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Evans
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Welch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Mousseau
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Loomis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sigi Moriece
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.