Teams

Goy 40s 4.0W Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 SinglesVirginia Easley vs Carol Schuck Dillon7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAlina Vannavong vs Julie Dover6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMandi Clift vs Kim Hunt6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKamron Moody vs Leigh Abraham2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesVirginia Easley vs Julie Dover6-4, 6-2
2026-07-06vs Pegula/Dover 40s 4.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 Singlessilvina piotti vs Leigh Abraham3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKristin Williamson vs Carol Schuck Dillon6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesVirginia Easley vs Leigh Abraham5-7, 3-6
W#2 Singlessilvina piotti vs Susan Parsons6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMandi Clift vs Tracy Harlan2-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs Pegula/Dover 40s 4.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlina Vannavong vs Susan Parsons3-4
L#2 Singlessilvina piotti vs Julie Dover4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVirginia Easley vs Susan Parsons1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKamron Moody vs Melissa Beeson7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChetana Honnarayanahalli vs Julie Dover2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlina Vannavong vs Leigh Abraham2-6, 2-6
W#2 Singlessilvina piotti vs Stephanie Farabow4-2
L#3 SinglesMandi Clift vs Melissa Goodman2-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs Pegula/Dover 40s 4.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesVirginia Easley vs Melissa Goodman6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKristin Williamson vs Tracy Harlan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Virginia Easley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.62
Alina Vannavong
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.56
silvina piotti
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.43
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kamron Moody
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Mandi Clift
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Alina Vannavong
57W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
silvina piotti
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.43
Kamron Moody
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Mandi Clift
27W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.