Teams

BP RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs GAC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Shaw / Josiane Broussard vs Tamara Pollack / Stephanie Gschwendtner6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulia Kantor vs Cassandra Buckner7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeska Jurasic / Mallory Karr vs Joanne Sender / Anne-Marie Rose6-3, 7-6
2022-04-09vs CACM ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Shaw / Julia Kantor vs Midori Clark / Inessa McGill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJosiane Broussard vs Leslie Greer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMallory Karr / Jeska Jurasic vs Tandy Dilworth / Camille Griffin6-7, 4-6
2022-04-03vs CP BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Shaw / Katie Shaw vs Gabrielle Mattioda / Alicia Jiron6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMallory Karr vs Claire Joyce6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJosiane Broussard / Julia Kantor vs Alexandra Hopkins / Jodi Denton6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-02vs WP ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Shaw / Mallory Karr vs Tricia Wright / Shelli Martin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJosiane Broussard / Julia Kantor vs Angelique Manley / Kristen Hanson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-26vs GTC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeska Jurasic / Mallory Karr vs Claire Buck / Lisa Winston2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Shaw vs Cristin Bracken6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulia Kantor / Josiane Broussard vs Dory Pratt / Sanda McMillan7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Josiane Broussard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.64
Mallory Karr
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Alison Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Jeska Jurasic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julia Kantor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Kantor + Josiane Broussard15462% games+9.8% vs expected
Mallory Karr + Jeska Jurasic6255% games+5.5% vs expected
Mallory Karr + Josiane Broussard20661% games+4.5% vs expected
Alison Shaw + Julia Kantor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Josiane Broussard
158W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Mallory Karr
115W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Alison Shaw
54W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeska Jurasic
25W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julia Kantor
54W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.