Teams

El.Saylors40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Ashley Walker7-6, 6-3
2024-04-30vs Kr.Gilreath40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesInma Navarro Galisteo / Lee Anne Oxford vs Jaime Clark / Jamie McCallum4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan6-2, 6-3
2024-04-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jennifer Roche6-4, 6-2
2024-04-16vs Br.Robinson40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Jennifer McFarling / Michele Nowicki6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jennifer Martin7-6, 7-5
2024-04-02vs La.Holderness40AWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Monica Gardner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesInma Navarro Galisteo / Lee Anne Oxford vs Kathryn Nani / Beth Farrell6-3, 6-1
2024-03-19vs La.Redmond40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Liz Arcos / Amanda Davis2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Ana Maria Allessi4-6, 2-6
2024-03-12vs Hop.Pflaum40ALost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Ryland Herring4-6, 2-6
2024-03-05vs Je.Komes40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Jenny Komes / Alice Touchette4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Zsuzsa Wahlen6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
2.77
Catherine George
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Janis McLaughlin
published
2.65
Julie Bullock
published
Jenna Cobb
published
Leigh Stallings
published
Mary Jo Cramer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+11.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Anne Oxford
82W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Inma Navarro Galisteo
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Catherine George
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Janis McLaughlin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Julie Bullock
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Jenna Cobb
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Stallings
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jo Cramer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.