Teams

Parks/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs 3.0 TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilson Hammond / Zachary Berning vs Juan Manuel Urquiza / Thomas Styles6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Moneyhun / Todd Blowers vs Burke Arthur / Scott Martz6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrandon Parks / Joe Michalik vs John Hoffman / Cliff Brooks4-6, 4-6
2025-11-23vs Gross/KnoxvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesDaniel Park / Scott Stallings vs Thomas Flores / Jeff Pewitt0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBrandon Parks vs Shawn Huffman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYan Gomes / Nicholas Panella vs Sam Luttrell / Dustin Hooks5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilson Hammond / Zachary Berning vs Jeff Gross / Mike Mansoor6-1, 6-3
2025-11-09vs 3.0 TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Park / Todd Blowers vs Scott Martz / Jay Slagle6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandon Parks / Nicholas Panella vs Burke Arthur / Juan Manuel Urquiza6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndy Crook / Joe Michalik vs John Hoffman / Zhigang Hu6-1, 6-4
2025-11-02vs Gross/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrandon Parks / Wilson Hammond vs Thomas Flores / Thomas Shirley6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesZachary Berning vs David Young6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrett Carroll / Andy Crook vs Shawn Huffman / Wade Shrivalle4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott Stallings / Joe Michalik vs Jeff Pewitt / Gregory Snodgrass4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-26vs 3.0 TeamWon 41
W#1 DoublesBrandon Parks / Brett Carroll vs Landon Finley / Chris Wright6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTodd Blowers vs Zhigang Hu6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Crook / Wilson Hammond vs Burke Arthur / John Hoffman6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesZachary Berning vs Colin Bohne6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoe Michalik / Nicholas Panella vs Matthew Huddleston / Thomas Styles5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Gross/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndy Crook / Brett Carroll vs David Young / Don Moster4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBrandon Parks vs Dustin Hooks6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Brandon Parks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.10
Todd Blowers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Zachary Berning
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Yan Gomes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Joe Michalik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Andy Crook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Scott Stallings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandon Parks
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Todd Blowers
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Zachary Berning
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Yan Gomes
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Joe Michalik
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Andy Crook
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Scott Stallings
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.