Teams

The Terminetters/Steelman/Danville

2024 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesKarlene Steelman / Laurie Radanovich vs Veronique Miro / Stephanie King6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDebbie Alster / Ali Rago vs Laurel Robinson / Michele Wang6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Reiners / Heather Paquette vs Elizabeth Olson / Christina Semba6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs RoyalGang/Yang/Palo AltoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarlene Steelman / Sarah Russell vs Julia Porter / Jennifer Jin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Erhart / Sunita Mistry vs Arianna Choing / Tracy Fujieda1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Azevedo / Michaela Katari vs Yangmei Zheng / Yue Xu1-6, 1-6
2024-10-11vs TENNIS BEES/Singh/AlamoWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Russell / Laurie Radanovich vs Margie Moran / Lillian Yang6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSunita Mistry / Alison Erhart vs Sanna Garcia / Daljeet Singh6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Paquette / Christine Reiners vs Patty Ly / Ashely Sokolov7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Karlene Steelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Laurie Radanovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Debbie Alster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Alison Erhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Sunita Mistry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Sarah Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ali Rago
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Heather Paquette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Christine Reiners
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Michaela Katari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Azevedo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Paquette + Christine Reiners134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Russell + Karlene Steelman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karlene Steelman
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Laurie Radanovich
45W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.75
4
Debbie Alster
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Alison Erhart
35W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Sarah Russell
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.33
3.5
Ali Rago
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Heather Paquette
20W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christine Reiners
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Michaela Katari
46W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
Robin Azevedo
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.