Teams

Baton Rouge Night - Bourgeois

55 & Over Combo Local At State · 8.5 (55 & Over) Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-02vs Shreveport Night - PharrWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucille Bourgeois / Catherine Hardy vs Tammy Cannon / Melissa Flurry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Simpson / Frances Fremaux vs Carla Hildebrand / Suzie Morrison6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllyson Morris / Suzanne Edmonson vs Sheila Pernici / Jennifer Frederick7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-01vs Shreveport Night - PharrWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracy Simpson / Leanne Payne vs Tammy Cannon / Melissa Flurry6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLucille Bourgeois / Catherine Hardy vs Carla Hildebrand / Jennifer Frederick6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllyson Morris / Suzanne Edmonson vs Sheila Pernici / Suzie Morrison7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 (55 & Over) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Allyson Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Leanne Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Frances Fremaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Suzanne Edmonson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Catherine Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Lucille Bourgeois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tracy Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Edmonson + Leanne Payne18164% games+3.4% vs expected
Tracy Simpson + Leanne Payne4161% gamesnot enough data
Lucille Bourgeois + Catherine Hardy4153% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Morris + Suzanne Edmonson314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Simpson + Lucille Bourgeois303 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Morris + Leanne Payne303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allyson Morris
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.04
Leanne Payne
56W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Frances Fremaux
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
1%86%13%
3.85
Suzanne Edmonson
42W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Catherine Hardy
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Lucille Bourgeois
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Simpson
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.