Teams

WESTWOOD

2023 OKCAdult 18 & Over Day League · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.70 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs QCWon 10
W#1 DoublesFabiola Hernandez / Ashley Vickers vs Summer DeFehr / Courtney Wallace6-2, 7-6
2023-05-16vs QCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Taylor / Becky Willeford vs Ashley Wolfe / Polly Kranz6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Vickers / Courtney Steer vs Leighann Price / Adrienne Reinersman6-7, 4-6
2023-05-12vs QCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Muzny / Becky Willeford vs Polly Kranz / Summer DeFehr7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFabiola Hernandez vs Hanieh Pace6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAshley Vickers / Courtney Steer vs Sarah Schmidt / Courtney Wallace4-6, 2-6
2023-05-09vs QCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Taylor / Fabiola Hernandez vs Ashley Wolfe / Mandy Washa7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBecky Willeford vs Marissa Wray6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCandace Webb / Courtney Steer vs Leighann Price / Adrienne Reinersman6-1, 6-3
2023-05-02vs QCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCandace Webb / Julie Taylor vs Sarah Schmidt / Polly Kranz6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFabiola Hernandez vs Hanieh Pace6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKate Vahlberg / Ashley Taylor vs Marissa Wray / Julie Dreiling6-3, 6-0
2023-04-18vs QCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Taylor / Fabiola Hernandez vs Ashley Wolfe / Polly Kranz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCandace Webb vs Summer DeFehr6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Vickers / Lane Krattiger vs Leighann Price / Jessica Nelson7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Candace Webb
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Fabiola Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Ashley Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Becky Willeford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Courtney Steer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Holly Muzny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Vahlberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lane Krattiger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lane Krattiger + Kate Vahlberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Candace Webb
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Fabiola Hernandez
68W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Ashley Vickers
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Becky Willeford
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Courtney Steer
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Holly Muzny
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kate Vahlberg
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lane Krattiger
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.