Teams

Valencia Bonita - Doran

2023 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-06vs Pelican Bay North - HowardLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Phelps / Katherine MacWilliams vs Judy Howell / Catherine Kelly6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Katherine MacWilliams vs Sharon Case / Nancy Schultz6-4, 6-1
2023-02-13vs World Tennis Club -Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Marci Bird vs Colleen Krause / Cathy Guida5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-30vs Stonebridge - Small-CarrollLost 01
L#1 DoublesGlenda Stein / Susan Phelps vs Katie Neuman / Mary Delisi4-6, 3-6
2023-01-16vs Village Walk Bonita - S GreekWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Phelps / Katherine MacWilliams vs Joan Ravens / Marilyn Neis7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Doran / Maria Prochilo vs Mary McIntire / Cynthia Hile6-2, 6-2
2023-01-09vs Lighthouse Bay - CoteLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Phelps / Marci Bird vs Mary Latini / Kristi Klukas6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
3.35
Glenda Stein
published 3.5
3.27
Hope Malin
published 3.5
3.19
Anne Pellon
published 3.5
3.10
Ellen Iverson
published 3.5
Karen Prueter
published
Kate Gredinger
published
Maria Prochilo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Doran
published
Rita Leone
published
Sue Capps
published
Susan Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Prochilo + Glenda Stein4251% gamesnot enough data
Maria Prochilo + Karen Prueter224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Prochilo + Rita Leone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Glenda Stein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Hope Malin
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Pellon
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Ellen Iverson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Prueter
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Gredinger
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Prochilo
48W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Doran
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rita Leone
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Capps
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.