Teams

Capeling/Nashville

2024 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - Wednesday AM & PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-04vs Broome/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesTara Reidy / Elizabeth Ward vs Linh Burnett / Mary Freeman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-14vs Songstad/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy McEvoy / Elizabeth Ward vs Kathryn Harlan / Kara Kolstad3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-31vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Bernadette Glasgow vs Hope Cummiskey / Becky Schneider5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Wednesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Tanya Capeling
published
3.67
Sonja Deere
published
3.65
Tara Reidy
published
3.65
Amy McEvoy
published 4
3.61
3.43
Michelle Palk
published
3.28
Bettina Moore
published 3.5
3.25
Sue Anne Perry
published
3.23
Kristie Skoda
published
3.06
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.05
Whitney Thompson
published
2.96
Elizabeth Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Norah Buikstra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson6554% games+5.7% vs expected
Michelle Palk + Desiree Appleby1442% games−11.5% vs expected
Sue Anne Perry + Kristie Skoda224 matchesnot enough data
Amy McEvoy + Desiree Appleby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Capeling
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Sonja Deere
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Tara Reidy
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Amy McEvoy
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Bernadette Glasgow
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Michelle Palk
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Bettina Moore
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Sue Anne Perry
20W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Kristie Skoda
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Desiree Appleby
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Whitney Thompson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
Norah Buikstra
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.