Teams

GEPTA/Adult 4.0M/Mirazo/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Christopher Baryla
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.73
Dante Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.22
Adam Rosenfield
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Enrique Mirazo
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Humberto Cardiel
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Jared Nieman
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jay Inzer
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Joseph Isaac
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Joshua Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ludovico Eduardo Soto
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Luis Herran
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Micah Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Nico Tejeda
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sergio Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
TJ Karam
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dante Garcia + Christopher Baryla6161% games+2.8% vs expected
TJ Karam + Jay Inzer10455% gamesnot enough data
Enrique Mirazo + TJ Karam4450% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Isaac + Enrique Mirazo4252% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Isaac + Christopher Baryla4163% gamesnot enough data
Enrique Mirazo + Jay Inzer3255% gamesnot enough data
Sergio Castaneda + Humberto Cardiel1444% gamesnot enough data
Micah Harrison + Christopher Baryla314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Baryla
70W–41L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Dante Garcia
103W–34L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Adam Rosenfield
11W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Enrique Mirazo
79W–93L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Humberto Cardiel
51W–62L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Nieman
17W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Inzer
39W–27L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Isaac
45W–26L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Hunt
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ludovico Eduardo Soto
38W–23L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Herran
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Micah Harrison
49W–64L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nico Tejeda
18W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sergio Castaneda
61W–81L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Karam
74W–40L career · 43 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.