Teams

DDeMaine/RVojjini (Queens)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs ILevelev (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAustin Miller vs Jarrett Meadors6-2, 6-4
2023-05-04vs KJohnson (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Miller / Devan McDaniel vs Phibes Vogel / Jose Paez4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-20vs FMasucci (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAustin Miller vs Eric O'Bryan6-3, 6-3
2023-04-19vs ILevelev (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDevan McDaniel / Austin Miller vs Zhen Zu / Martin Palmeri7-5, 6-4
2023-04-13vs JIngram (Veterans Park)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAustin Miller / Devan McDaniel vs Kevin Blocker / Chris Franc6-1, 6-2
2023-03-30vs RBombien (Mountainbrook)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDevan McDaniel / Austin Miller vs Rob Fauntleroy / Ben Senn6-3, 6-3
2023-03-16vs SGallegos (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAustin Miller / John Bentley vs Scott Gallegos / Lawrence Jinks5-7, 4-6
2023-03-09vs KJohnson (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAustin Miller vs Gabriel Everett6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Micah Robbins
published
3.88
Austin Miller
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.81
Alex Giardina
published 4
3.81
Evan Koch
published 4
Devan McDaniel
published 4
3.70
3.69
Devon DeMaine
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Sai Venky Ganduri
published
Jim Yablonski
published
Ryan Poage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sai Venky Ganduri + Rakesh Kumar Vojjini3352% gamesnot enough data
Alex Giardina + Ryan Poage224 matchesnot enough data
Austin Miller + Micah Robbins303 matchesnot enough data
Austin Miller + Devon DeMaine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Micah Robbins
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Austin Miller
119W–56L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Alex Giardina
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Evan Koch
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Devan McDaniel
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rakesh Kumar Vojjini
36W–30L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Devon DeMaine
96W–41L career · 10 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Sai Venky Ganduri
38W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jim Yablonski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Poage
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.