Teams

SD LT Balboa TC (Noon)/ Agra

2026 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

18 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-23vs SD LT Balboa TC (Noon)/ WolpertLost 03
L#1 DoublesClint Knox / Aaron Keohane vs Christopher Barrera / Aayush Khurana3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Trejo / Soon Chye Ho vs Joshua Zietz / Sami Sweis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKyle Granali / Moe Mubarak vs Josh Yu / Jesse Nagelberg6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRomain Delaville / Kevin Moyung vs Luke Chang / Vinh Dang2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCody Heitzman / Alex Trejo vs Kennett Lai / Aravind Srinath6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Glozman / Derek Nguyen vs Donald Wright / Jerry Thomas6-3, 6-1
2026-08-17vs SDNC LT UCRC (2:30PM)/ KaoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Moyung / Darius Chan vs Ryan Salas / Nizam Khan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Trejo / Moe Mubarak vs Genta Kaieda / Tim Situ5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDerek Nguyen / David Glozman vs Darrick Lor / Nathan Beutler3-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ FalticoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesClint Knox / Aaron Keohane vs Joao Allende / Jeffrey Russell6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Strack / David Glozman vs David Bell / Shawn Pollard4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKyle Granali / Cody Heitzman vs James Capurro / Jerry Thomas6-2, 7-5
2026-07-13vs SDNC LT UCRC (2:30PM)/ KaoLost 03
L#1 DoublesRomain Delaville / Alex Trejo vs Nizam Khan / Greg Maier1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDarius Chan / Motoki Horii vs Genta Kaieda / Chi-Wei Man1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMoe Mubarak / David Glozman vs Imran Matin / Darrick Lor1-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ FalticoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAaron Keohane / Clint Knox vs Victor Zayas / Colin Chang6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKyle Granali / Moe Mubarak vs Richard Schwab / David Goodwin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC LT Miramar College (2:30PM)/ Kalabus5113513146
2SD LT Balboa TC (Noon)/ Wolpert329613114
3SDNC LT UCRC (2:30PM)/ Kao238714125
4SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ Faltico2441430200
5SD LT Balboa TC (Noon)/ Agra135714120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jonathan Park
published
3.71
Clint Knox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Joel Corrales
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.60
Kevin Moyung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Aaron Keohane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Soon Chye Ho
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Alex Trejo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Cody Heitzman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Romain Delaville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Darius Chan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
James Agra
published 3.5
3.25
Motoki Horii
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Connor Madden
published 3.5
2.93
Kyle Granali
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
David Glozman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Moe Mubarak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Derek Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeff Strack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Agra + Joel Corrales5059% games+4.3% vs expected
Kyle Granali + Moe Mubarak134 matchesnot enough data
Darius Chan + Motoki Horii134 matchesnot enough data
Soon Chye Ho + Joel Corrales314 matchesnot enough data
Clint Knox + Aaron Keohane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Park
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Clint Knox
4W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Joel Corrales
17W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Kevin Moyung
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Aaron Keohane
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Soon Chye Ho
21W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Alex Trejo
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Cody Heitzman
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Romain Delaville
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Darius Chan
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
James Agra
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Motoki Horii
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Connor Madden
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Granali
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
David Glozman
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Moe Mubarak
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Derek Nguyen
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Strack
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.