Teams

SD 9.0 Balboa TC/ Anderson

2026 SoCal 65 & Over Summer-SD · SDNC

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMary Thomas / Colleen Clery Ferrell vs Dolores Ilko / Sundi Olson4-6, 2-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Gay / Ruth Young vs Sue Sprague / Joni Gurrola4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYoko Anderson / Carol Gay vs Lynn Ellis / Sarah Miller4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCarol Gay / Colleen Clery Ferrell vs Kellie Jaquez / Shelley Goodson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Anderson / Debbie Gerlack vs Janet McLees / Sundi Olson1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCarol Gay / Debbie Gerlack vs Kellie Jaquez / Fiona Taylor0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Anderson / Janene Christopher vs Maria Nunez / Lynn Ellis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Anderson / Carol Gay vs Tina Giubilato / Kellie Jaquez1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMary Thomas / Carol Gay vs Tina Giubilato / Maria Nunez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Anderson / Debbie Gerlack vs Fiona Taylor / Sarah Miller0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesColleen Clery Ferrell / Yoko Anderson vs Shelley Goodson / Dolores Ilko1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Thomas / Carol Gay vs Janet McLees / Fiona Taylor5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesYoko Anderson / Mary Thomas vs Dolores Ilko / Maria Nunez0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 9.0 Palacio Del Mar (2:1)/ Jaquez70192486
2SD 9.0 Balboa TC/ Anderson0721939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Colleen Clery Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Celia Lukomski
published 4
3.71
Carol Gay
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Driver
published 4
3.60
Debbie Gerlack
published 4
3.51
Ruth Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yoko Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yoko Anderson + Debbie Gerlack044 matchesnot enough data
Janene Christopher + Cynthia Driver134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Gerlack + Cynthia Driver134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Driver + Celia Lukomski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Clery Ferrell
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
4
Celia Lukomski
28W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Carol Gay
2W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Cynthia Driver
23W–39L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Debbie Gerlack
31W–73L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Janene Christopher
97W–105L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Ruth Young
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yoko Anderson
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.