Teams

CMoffitt-ENO

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-26vs NPuri-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesKobi Talma / Tanner Dellinger vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash / Ryan Jobling1-6, 0-6
2025-07-19vs AJoshi-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Dash Rajarajhan vs Amit Sachan / Nitni Agrawal2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-12vs JMontague-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Jay Krueger vs Will Johnson / Rick Edmunds4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-28vs AJoshi-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Weslander / Christopher Green vs Madhusudhanarao Nelapati / Anjaneya Tiwari3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJay Krueger / Dash Rajarajhan vs Sam Stewart / Shivam Panthri6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChris Moffitt / Joseph Davis vs Rajeev Bhogadi / Jeremy Wheelwright2-6, 1-6
2025-06-07vs NPuri-ENOLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Weslander / Mark Petersen vs Sanjay Ambardar / Vishal Gupta6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJay Krueger / Dash Rajarajhan vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash / Ashok Babu Raparla3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Davis / Chris Moffitt vs Nikhil Kulkarni / Guri Burmi5-7, 3-6
2025-05-31vs AJoshi-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Weslander / Christopher Green vs Abhimanyu Joshi / AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Michael Weslander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
3.63
Mark Petersen
published
3.46
Dash Rajarajhan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Devon DiPalma
published 3.5
3.25
Tanner Dellinger
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Kobi Talma
published
3.14
Jeff Pobst
published
3.02
Chris Moffitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jay Krueger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Moffitt + Dash Rajarajhan2738% gamesnot enough data
Michael Weslander + Christopher Green404 matchesnot enough data
Tanner Dellinger + Dash Rajarajhan123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Moffitt + Kobi Talma123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Weslander
214W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Christopher Green
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mark Petersen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dash Rajarajhan
66W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Devon DiPalma
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Tanner Dellinger
37W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kobi Talma
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jeff Pobst
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Chris Moffitt
98W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jay Krueger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.