Teams

Mission Oaks Warriors

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · Ventura - Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1V- LLW Wood Ranch Dukes- Johnson8026616204
2WAC Daddies62211128248
3Mission Oaks Scorpions53181436309
4Sunset Hills Spartans44191334299
5Mission Oaks Warriors44131943304
6Las Posas Rebels35131941304
7North Ranch Racketeers26131942326
8Spanish Hills Smooth26122043323
9Mission Oaks Rockets2682451345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Andre Guerzet
published 4
3.83
Amir Arfaei
published 4
3.55
Kevin Humfreville
published
3.53
Dan Crane
published 4
3.50
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.46
Michael Agacite
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Randy Andell
published
3.17
Erik Loose
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Steve Sylvers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Matthew Dawe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Rodrigo Reis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Crane + Randy Andell033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Humfreville + Erik Loose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andre Guerzet
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Amir Arfaei
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Kevin Humfreville
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Dan Crane
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.53
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Michael Agacite
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Randy Andell
6W–19L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
Erik Loose
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Steve Sylvers
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Matthew Dawe
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Rodrigo Reis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.