Teams

BURK-Butterworth

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.69 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-26vs SAL-BerryWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Christopher Corts / Tiffany Jeremiah7-5, 6-1
2022-03-20vs WO-BlackwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Anne Elles / Keith Nix6-2, 6-3
2022-03-05vs ACAC-ChandlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Maka Lowenstein / Majd Babik3-6, 1-6
2022-02-26vs RAIN-SinsabaughLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Margie Ray / Chris Ray3-6, 3-6
2022-02-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Beth Gardner / James Lawrence6-3, 7-5
2022-01-29vs HERM-BerensLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Lindsey Genter / Gary Farrar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-22vs WW-WrightLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood vs Clara Laing / Cary Broocks6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.05
4.81
Blake Goldsmith
published 5
4.60
4.50
Katherine Carnohan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.45
Ethan Belote
published 4.5
4.41
Logan Stone
published
4.34
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.25
Kyle Russell
published
4.22
Cary Polk
published 4.5
3.96
Keith Harvey
published
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.47
Mary Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Carnohan + Keith Harvey5257% gamesnot enough data
Cary Polk + Katherine Carnohan224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Hazelwood + Blake Goldsmith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Audrey Butterworth
14W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
5.05
5
Blake Goldsmith
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Edward Butterworth
84W–23L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
4.60
4.5
Katherine Carnohan
70W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Ethan Belote
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.45
Logan Stone
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Kyle Russell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Cary Polk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Keith Harvey
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.96
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Davis
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.