Teams

EW-PFC-Schnurman

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-22vs EW-PC-KhounnalaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Hannigan / Kayla Sharp vs Maggie Levy / Autumn Fielding-monson3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMandy Manning vs Chisa Blair6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Loretz / Judy Chessar vs Sunghee Moon / Sun Hae Ra Shin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-22vs YTC-Drop It Like It's ShotWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebi Herbst / Ann Kelley vs Alexa Palomarez / Abril Rosas Crow6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKayla Sharp vs Sasha Grigoryants6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Sara Hannigan vs Brittany Bemis / Kellye Richelderfer4-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs EW-PC-KhounnalaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKayla Sharp / Judy Chessar vs Sunghee Moon / Sun Hae Ra Shin1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMandy Manning vs Chisa Blair6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDebi Herbst / Ann Kelley vs Maggie Levy / Autumn Fielding-monson1-6, 0-6
2026-03-21vs CBRC-PorterWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Chessar / Linda Loretz vs Kim Pak / Karina Klein6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKayla Sharp vs Marija Velickovic6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Sara Hannigan vs Andrea Porter / Shirley Qiao1-6, 4-6
2026-03-20vs CBRC-PorterWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Sara Hannigan vs Andrea Porter / Karina Klein3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKayla Sharp vs Marija Velickovic6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Loretz / Judy Chessar vs Kim Pak / Shirley Qiao7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs YTC-Drop It Like It's ShotWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Kayla Sharp vs Tiffany Lundberg / Sasha Grigoryants6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMandy Manning vs Kellye Richelderfer6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Kelley / Debi Herbst vs Valerie Hull / Martha Marchand2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Mandy Manning
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.43
Kayla Sharp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Susan Boinski
published
2.31
Linda Loretz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Ann Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Judy Chessar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.09
Anne Schnurman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Debi Herbst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.85
Sara Hannigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Schnurman + Sara Hannigan044 matchesnot enough data
Judy Chessar + Linda Loretz213 matchesnot enough data
Debi Herbst + Anne Schnurman033 matchesnot enough data
Debi Herbst + Ann Kelley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mandy Manning
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.63
Kayla Sharp
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.43
Susan Boinski
9W–38L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Linda Loretz
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Ann Kelley
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Judy Chessar
10W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Anne Schnurman
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Debi Herbst
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Sara Hannigan
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.