Teams

NorCal/Wei/Tri-Level3.0/3.5/4.0M

2025 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-04vs DH Bravo/Austero/OakleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvan Wong / Chuo-Yun Yang vs Doug Bounds / Aaron Lee5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNing Li / Bill Wei vs William Burns / Steve Grimm2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDevank Agarwal / Orien Xu vs Lucas Trevino / Michael Lovett6-0, 6-0
2025-04-04vs Pain in the Ace/Austero/OakleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesEvan Wong / Juan Pablo Q Weston vs Moses Reyes / Mithilesh Salunke5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNing Li / Bill Wei vs Chris Adams / Gary Nelson Tolentino6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDevank Agarwal / Orien Xu vs Gary Namanny / Abi Sri6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Andy Ewing
published 4.5
3.99
Mitchell Barraza
published
3.92
Daniel Kroes
published 4
3.87
Jiajie Li
published
3.78
JZ Zhong
published 4
3.77
Chuo-Yun Yang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Evan Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Shuchun Zhao
published
3.64
Nan Sun
published
3.61
Devank Agarwal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Orien Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Bill Wei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Juan Pablo Q Weston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
JIANWEI GONG
published 3.5
Koki Yoshida
published
Ning Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andy Ewing
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.24
Mitchell Barraza
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Jiajie Li
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
JZ Zhong
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Chuo-Yun Yang
30W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Evan Wong
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Shuchun Zhao
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Nan Sun
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Devank Agarwal
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Orien Xu
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Bill Wei
29W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Juan Pablo Q Weston
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
JIANWEI GONG
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
Koki Yoshida
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ning Li
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.