Teams

Raintree Stahling

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17vs TDC LongLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure vs Heidi Collier / Sheri Carlyle4-6, 6-7
2022-06-15vs Burkwood JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Valerie Caldwell vs Pam Wood / Lynn Reeves6-1, 6-1
2022-06-10vs WOCC PommersheimLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Cametas / Carolyn Moncure vs Janet Pommersheim / Katherine Berry6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Natalie Dunton0-6, 0-6
2022-06-08vs SCC NoblesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Lisa Penny vs Susan Gregory / Donna Jamison6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Megan Lloyd vs Laura Haskin / Heather Joyce7-5, 6-2
2022-06-03vs ACAC CamdenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Cametas / Carolyn Moncure vs Carole Camden / Elisebeth Gelardi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Elizabeth Coleman1-6, 0-6
2022-05-27vs KRA FleckLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Lloyd / Amy Boschen vs Carlyle Walek / Kristy Seredni4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-25vs Stonehenge GoodreauWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Cametas / Carolyn Moncure vs Ann Falk / Amy Grattan6-2, 6-4
2022-05-20vs Westwood TowlerLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Boschen / Megan Lloyd vs Janet Livick / Elizabeth Diller7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Carolyn Moncure
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Megan Lloyd
published
3.16
Lisa Penny
published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.86
Pam Koch
published
Stephanie Cametas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Stahling + Lisa Penny123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Penny + Carolyn Moncure123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Megan Lloyd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Lisa Penny
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
Stephanie Cametas
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.