Teams

ESB:Racketeers:Smith/Merrill

2025 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-13vs TRS:IvanierLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Maja Smith vs Vivianne Ivanier / Megan Shrestha2-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs ESB:Smith/NorotskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarsha Weisfeld / Lisa Merrill vs Deborah Norotsky / Susan Thornburg6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-14vs TRS:IvanierLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaja Smith / Marsha Weisfeld vs Megan Shrestha / Elmira Shea3-6, 0-6
2025-11-07vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Marsha Weisfeld vs Gini Park / Megan OBrien6-3, 7-5
2025-11-01vs ESB:Smith/NorotskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Merrill / Marsha Weisfeld vs Kate Cunningham / Kristin Walsh6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-10-19vs TRS:IvanierLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Durieux / Nicole Hansen vs Vivianne Ivanier / Megan Shrestha6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Hansen / Maja Smith vs Gretchen Gaida Michaels / Kathryn Ruwet6-1, 6-1
2025-09-27vs ESB:Smith/NorotskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Durieux / Lisa Merrill vs Jennifer Rowling / Karen Smith6-3, 6-4
2025-09-12vs ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/GaidaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Durieux / Nicole Hansen vs Megan OBrien / Kathryn Ruwet6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TRS:Ivanier8181442
2ESB:Racketeers:Smith/Merrill5454972
3ESB:Smith/Norotsky45451282
4ESB:Lobsters:Ruwet/Gaida181816106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Lori Durieux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Maja Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Lisa Merrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Marsha Weisfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Durieux + Marsha Weisfeld5066% games+13.9% vs expected
Nicole Hansen + Marsha Weisfeld3353% games+5.3% vs expected
Lisa Merrill + Maja Smith2741% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Merrill + Marsha Weisfeld3545% gamesnot enough data
Lori Durieux + Nicole Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Durieux
37W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Maja Smith
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Lisa Merrill
29W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Marsha Weisfeld
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Nicole Hansen
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.