Teams

Oaksmith

2024 Howard Columbia Combo · Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.78 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-10-28vs LaMoure - Double TroubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Simmons / Leanne Paranik vs Sanghee Lee / Maneesha Ahluwalia6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGena Conron / Julie Gowin vs Amy LaMoure / GENA CHUNG4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Lyons / Susan Homberg vs Karen Jones / Evelyn Chan2-6, 2-6
2024-10-28vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Deanto / Madison Simmons vs Stephanie Richards / Jean Chaisson6-4, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGena Conron / Julie Gowin vs Sally Christie / Julie Swartz6-0, 6-3
2024-10-27vs Jenkins - Penn PalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Leanne Paranik vs Robin Burton / Elizabeth Amerault6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Gena Conron vs Diane Carroll / Denise Buch2-6, 0-6
2024-10-17vs LaMoure - Double TroubleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMadison Simmons / Leanne Paranik vs Ellen McLaughlin / Linda Tsai5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachael Mott / Elisa Oaksmith vs Erin Kim / GENA CHUNG0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-15vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachael Mott / Stacey Lyons vs Eboni Lance / Leslie Mansfield4-6, 3-6
2024-10-12vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesJoan Ray / Susan Homberg vs Kim Daniels / Carmen Scurato4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristine Alewine / Linda Deanto vs Natalie Leveque / Cintya Leveque6-3, 6-1
2024-10-09vs Jenkins - Penn PalsWon 20
W#2 DoublesLynn Gorman / Rachael Mott vs Sydney Anderson / Mary Klett6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Gowin / Leanne Paranik vs Margaret Asher / Mollie Crocker6-4, 6-3
2024-10-08vs Lee-Der of the PackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Alewine / Linda Deanto vs Eboni Lance / Leslie Mansfield0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachael Mott / Joan Ray vs Angela Parker / Julie Edwards6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-07vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Simmons / Linda Deanto vs Kim Daniels / Jennie Kim7-5, 4-5
W#2 DoublesJulie Gowin / Joan Ray vs Stephanie Richards / Jean Chaisson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachael Mott / Stacey Lyons vs Cora Ho / Eileen Dietz6-3, 6-5
2024-09-22vs Jenkins - Penn PalsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Leanne Paranik vs Mary Shawhan / Elizabeth Amerault4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGena Conron / Julie Gowin vs Mollie Crocker / Valerie Hicks6-1, 6-3
2024-09-13vs LaMoure - Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesGena Conron / Christine Alewine vs Jill Rose / Sanghee Lee6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Deanto / Susan Homberg vs Fiona Williamson / Jennifer Lee6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Madison Simmons
published
3.85
Julie Gowin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
3.67
Susan Homberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Brooke Schetgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Rachael Mott
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Leanne Paranik
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Linda Deanto
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynn Gorman
published
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leanne Paranik + Linda Deanto441263% games+1.3% vs expected
Gena Conron + Julie Gowin3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Simmons
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Julie Gowin
227W–211L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Christine Alewine
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Susan Homberg
75W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Rachael Mott
89W–126L career · 5 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Leanne Paranik
80W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Linda Deanto
187W–124L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.