Teams

Kapoor-Bad News Bears-Lifetime Kingwood

*2022 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Penny Smith-Hill
published
3.25
Kelly Krenzke
published
3.06
Nancy Schmid
published
3.04
Lisa Parrish
published
3.01
Theresa Jardine
published
2.92
Bobbie Glasscock
published 3
2.82
Brittany Love
published 3
Brycie Parnham
published 3
2.72
Danell Dykstra
published 3
Kim Dushinske
published
Lee Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Smith-Hill + Nancy Schmid8356% games+2.7% vs expected
Penny Smith-Hill + Kelly Krenzke8551% games−2.6% vs expected
Danell Dykstra + Bobbie Glasscock033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Smith-Hill
57W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kelly Krenzke
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Nancy Schmid
18W–25L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lisa Parrish
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Theresa Jardine
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Bobbie Glasscock
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Anne-Marie Kapoor
8W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Bobbie van Norman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brittany Love
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brycie Parnham
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Danell Dykstra
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Kim Dushinske
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lee Lewis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.