← Teams

CGM-Watson/Palena

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Cyndi Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
ROSY ALANIS
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-06-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Cyndi Johnson vs Janet Ha / Sabine Verbiest6-1, 6-1
2024-06-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Tamara Phillips vs Catherine Huang / Shuping Li6-4, 7-5
2024-06-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDelena Palena / Cyndi Johnson vs Dana Alley / Robin Browne6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Alena Ofuasia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-25Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesROSY ALANIS vs Gretchen Sturm6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDelena Palena / Cyndi Johnson vs Adrienne Dedelow / Molly Hisatomi6-3, 6-1
2024-05-10Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAlisa Rakoz / Tamara Phillips vs Gretchen Sturm / Shelly Bigley6-2, 6-3
2024-04-27Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesDelena Palena / ROSY ALANIS vs Cricket Forsey / Carmen Warda6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCyndi Johnson / Jill Watson vs Laura Berner / Anne Stein-Gray6-4, 6-4
2024-04-20Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesROSY ALANIS vs Melissa Lanceta6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Cyndi Johnson
39W–22L career
0%84%16%
2.97
3
ROSY ALANIS
43W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.