← Teams

Payne Park Peace, Love & Tennis

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-17vs Sarasota - LWN/ArringtonWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesCindy Davis / Claudia Kelly vs Lee Sachs / Sheila Weiss6-1, 2-2
2022-06-10vs LBK Public LevyWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesCindy Davis / Rebecca Gibson vs Diana Trivax Levy / Judy Kozlowski6-0, 6-1
2022-05-07vs Sarasota - LWN/ArringtonLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNikki Gifford / Zobeida Canfield vs Nichole Bontell / DeAnne Fischer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-23vs Sarasota - LWN/ArringtonSplit 1–1
L#2 DoublesCindy Davis / Claudia Kelly vs Tressa Ridge / Lee Sachs4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichele Vandendooren / Zobeida Canfield vs Jeri Fitchette / Kathleen Henn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-16vs SSC WindsorWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesZobeida Canfield / Michele Vandendooren vs Mauri Blefeld / Karen Kondrad6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-02vs LBK Public LevyWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gibson / Carrie Walsh vs Kori White / Martha Talyor6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesZobeida Canfield / Michele Vandendooren vs Erin Neufelder / Brenda Shields3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Mari-Ann Kucharek
published —
3.59
Roberta Smith
published —
3.56
Carrie Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Nikki Gifford
published —
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published —
3.40
Zobeida Canfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Wendi Chapman
published 3.5
—
Christina Erazo
published 3.5
3.19
Claudia Kelly
published 3.5
3.18
Robin Sheridan
published —
3.15
3.11
Jan Sutter
published —
3.00
Cindy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zobeida Canfield + Rebecca Gibson6–262% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Mari-Ann Kucharek
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
—
Roberta Smith
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Carrie Walsh
44W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
—
Nikki Gifford
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
—
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Zobeida Canfield
170W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Wendi Chapman
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christina Erazo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3.5
Claudia Kelly
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
—
Robin Sheridan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
—
Michele Vandendooren
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
—
Jan Sutter
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cindy Davis
93W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.